Sunday, November 25, 2012

Two sets of notes for papers by Norman Rockwell






Norman Rockwell was a member of the Monday Evening Club from 1961 until his death in 1978. Previously, we have posted two papers for which standard manuscript drafts survive: "The bed of Procrustes" and "Which way?" The recollection of members who were Rockwell's contemporaries in the Club is, however, that normally Rockwell spoke extemporaneously about a painting or drawing he would bring to the meeting, with at most a few scribbled notes. We reproduce here transcriptions of two such sets of notes, taken from undated manuscripts in the collection of the Norman Rockwell Museum in Stockbridge, Mass. In these transcriptions,  spelling and punctuation is generally left as it is in the original. While we can not gather the full impact of Rockwell's storytelling from these notes, there is enough to get the gist of the talk and perhaps to glean a few of the opinions he expressed.



The Club is grateful for the assistance of Corry Kanzenburg and Jessika Drmacich of the collections staff at the Norman Rockwell Museum in Stockbridge, Mass. for providing access to the manuscript of this and other papers Rockwell presented to the Club, to the museum's director, Laurie Norton Moffatt, for alerting us to their existence (via a Facebook comment!) and to the Norman Rockwell Licensing Company for permission to publish the papers. Licensed by Norman Rockwell Licensing, Niles, IL.



The first paper is entitled "Extra Ordinary Men," in which Rockwell recalls his experiences creating portraits of some of the leading political figures of his time. Rockwell appears to have incorporated bits from another speech about these subjects into this presentation.




[Addendum:] According to a Club invitation card in the collection of the Norman Rockwell Museum, this paper was delivered on Monday evening, January 18, 1971 at the home of Harry E. Judson on Tor Court in Pittsfield.  





[Envelope:] Monday Evening Club

To Albert Silverman

Silverman [a Berkshire County attorney; not a club member]



[handwritten notes]

After Roger’s wonderful paper two weeks ago [Roger Linscott], which was so well done and thorough.  I feel this may be quite trivial, disjointed and perhaps even frivolous and overpersonal.



The title, you know, is “Extra Ordinary Men?”



First all all [sic] I must explain my contact with each man was for less than an hour.



I[n] every case I made a very rough color sketch and then I posed them for my photographer.



I posed them against a neutral color blanket, s most of them posed in their offices.  I took along what I called a blanket man, to cut out the convusion of the locations.  I call him my “Blan[k]et Man.”



I repeat I was never with them more than an hour.



That was all the time they could give me out of their busy days.



What I would like to have you discuss is whether these little incidents that occur[r]ed could be considered indicative of their true charcter or completely unimportant.



May I pause now to quote from a book by G? W. Gardner



He is distinguished thinker.



Quote



“No one who has received the sweep of American history will believe that our leaders are any more deficient in in quality than they were a decade or a century ago.  That they seem so is due partly to the breakdown in authority and partly to our increased skill in stripping them of dignity.  Men in power have never been fully protected by the mantle of respect surrounding high office but today they are naked as bluejays.”

End quote



I shall now relate these incidents more or less as they occurred.



Nehru

Nasser

Tito

Eisenhower

John F. Kennedy

Bob Kennedy

Adlai Stevenson

Goldwater

Johnson

Hubert Humphrey

McCormick

Nelson Rockefeller

Reagan

Niebuhr

Erik Erikson



Notes from other talks about some of these:



[Envelope:] Brief notes only

Speech about trip with Bob Sherrod [American journalist]



Thank you.

5 minutes for Europe

This is no travel talk

It’s about 3 Individuals I met



I only saw them 1 hour each

Post

 Change of policy

Task Force

Bob Sherrod

Ellie Atkins

 Wife



Molly [Rockwell] studied their live[s]

I did not



First trip India

Mr. Nehru

China Invading

Nehru and Gandhi

Peace and None Resistance

—

Nehru in Parlement

Calm and soft spoken

“I mislaid my brain”

Lunch at prime minister’s

Daughter

White Coat

Next Moscow

Called off

More about this later

Home



March 7th

Off to Mr. Nasser

Arrive 5 minutes to see Nasser

His home

I pose him

Mr. Haekel and Nasser in Saudi Arabia

Jimmy and the Sphinx



Next to Tito

Belgrade grim

New Constitution

Start 7 a.m.

Tito arrive 4:30 p.m.

Blond Hair

Cold after Egypt

To Dubrovic [sic]

Sneak picture to Holland

Home



3 individuals

Nehru 

Quiet

Man of peace

Educated



Nasser

Young

Uneducated

Energetic



Tito

Man of power holding 5 nations together.

All loved by their people

Reverenced



The second set of notes pertains to a paper about the autobiography Rockwell wrote and published in 1960, My Adventures as an Illustrator. This paper must have been presented to the Club about 1961. The numbering of pages begins with 2 and is not consecutive throughout.



2.

Not an Art Lecture

Profound and erudite



3.

About the Autobiography published last year

I will try [to] tell how Autobiography came about.



4. 

Start as book of color plates with commentary 

Doubleday

Ghost writer

No humor

Success story



5

Sent Ghostwrites

6 weeks

Success Story?



9

I am desperate

Doubleday editor gone to Europe

I call Ken Stuart



10

Ken Stuart fires Ghost

I suggest Tom



11

We took 1 year

Kitchen

Arguments

No longer commentary

1400 Words



12

We show it to Doubleday

They show it to Post



13

Ben, Ken + Bob

Invite me to lunch

BOOM!!



14.

Produced in Post

Cleaned up



15.

Now comes

IMPORTANT

checking

For instance



16.

Dumb Waiter Story and Texas Wyman [?]

Checking

Old newspapers

city records

Police



18

Opera

Emmy Destinn

“Change Eonds [?], You darn fool”



19

Corset Story



20

Then the lawyers Libel

Dead Men

Tom [Rockwell, Norman's son, who collaborated on the book] did fine job



21

Publicity

6 radio

2 TV

arranged by Post



22

Jack Paar

Godfrey

Martha Dean

Senator Dirksen

Barry Gray





23

Press Notices

Atlantic Monthly 

Favorable

But one phrase

“His prose descriptions are very effective, cold and almost savage with controlled fury.”



24

unfavorable

A.P.

Ends with

“It [is] a nice story of a nice man who knows a lot of nice people and leads a very nice life.”



Possible?

I paint the leader speech




[end of notes]












Read More

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Why are you laughing? — an exploration of the nature of humor




Photo by eliastar, used under Creative Commons License




Presented to the Club by David T. Noyes on Monday evening, Oct. 22, 2012


A new pastor was visiting the homes of his parishioners.


At one house it seemed obvious that someone was at home, but no answer came to his repeated knocks at the door. Therefore, he took out a card and wrote "Revelation 3:20" on the back of it and stuck it in the door. 


When the offering was processed the following Sunday, he found that his card had been returned. Added to it was this cryptic message: “Genesis 3:10." 


Reaching for his Bible to check out the citation, he found that Revelation 3:20 begins "Behold, I stand at the door and knock." Genesis 3:10 reads, "I heard your voice in the garden and I was afraid, for I was naked.


Humor. What makes us laugh? I have come to the conclusion in the process of writing this paper that it’s terribly hard to define. And unlike Justice Potter Stewart’s comment about pornography, I don’t always “know it when I see it.” Something I might find hilarious may not even bring a smirk to your face. And vice versa! 

I thought it might be fun to delve into the topic of humor. This is not intended to be an exhaustive discussion—just think of the wildly diverse collection you could put together: Puns, limericks, sarcasm, caricature, slapstick, political satire, irony, parody, dark humor, ethnic/racial humor, bathroom humor, etc. And that doesn’t even begin to include the host of media involved—TV, movies, books, cartoons, billboards.





Let me start with some examples of one of the simplest, perhaps weakest forms of humor:—puns


  1. The butcher backed up into the meat grinder and got a little behind in his work.

  2. A hole has been found in the nudist camp wall. The police are looking into it.

  3. Did you hear about the fellow whose whole left side was cut off? He’s all right now.

  4. To write with a broken pencil is pointless.

  5. I wondered why the Frisbee was getting bigger, and then it hit me.



The reader prematurely commits to a misinterpretation, which in the end he realizes is unwarranted.





Of course an oxymoron, defined as a contradictory word pair, is a form of punning. George Carlin is generally credited with popularizing this form in his stand up routines. “Jumbo Shrimp” and “Military Intelligence” are two well known examples. But I’ve come across many others:  Authentic Reproduction; Microsoft Works; Gourmet Pizza; Resident Alien; Female Sperm Whale; Terribly Nice; White Chocolate; or how about--Religious Right!





Then there are the “Paraprosdokians”, which are figures of speech in which a sentence or phrase starts out in one way and then pulls a sudden dramatic reversal that causes the listener to reframe or reinterpret the first part. Stand up comedians prefer them because the set up and the punch line are in the same line.


  1. The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it’s still on the list.

  2. If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.

  3. Oscar Wilde: Some people cause happiness wherever they go. Others whenever they go.

  4. You don’t need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.

  5. Will Rogers: “I don’t belong to an organized political party. I’m a Democrat.” Or this Rogers quote I’ve used several times at the Monday Evening Club: “When the Oakies leftOklahoma and moved to California, it raised the I.Q. of both states.”

  6. Two wrongs don’t make a right, but three lefts do.

  7. Or the famous Winston Churchill line: “You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing. But only after they’ve tried everything else.”

  8. Americans choose between two people for president, but among fifty for Miss America.



These are all examples of what is generally considered first person humor.





In ancient physiology the humors were the four fluids of the body: blood, phlegm, yellow bile and black bile. The proportions of these fluids were thought to determine our temperament. The term humor came to be associated with mood—one could be in good humor, meaning one’s fluids were in balance. Eventually the word came to be associated with the positive notion of amusement. 


In Ireland every Saturday morning, the entire congregation makes their way to confession to cleanse their souls to prepare for Sunday mass. The priest enters his side of the confessional and waits for the first sinner to enter. A moment later he hears the door open and a voice say: 


“Bless me Father, for I have sinned. I have been with a loose girl. 


Father Flanagan, the Parish priest recognized the voice as one of his altar boys and asked, “Is that you little Sean O’Malley? 


Sean sheepishly replied, “Yes, Father, it is. 


Father Flanagan pressed, “And who was this loose girl you were with then? 


Sean stated, “I cannot tell you, Father. I don’t want to ruin her reputation. 


Father Flanagan whispered back, “Well, Sean, I am sure to find out her name soon enough so you may as well tell me now. Was it Mary Rooney? 


Sean replied, “I cannot say." 


Father Flanagan pressed further, “Was it Elizabeth Casey? 


Sean spoke, “I’ll never tell Father." 


Father asked, “Was it Patty Mulligan?" 


Sean replied, “I’m sorry, but I cannot name her.” 


Once more, Father Flanagan asked, “Was it Rebecca Muldoon, then?” 


Sean softly spoke, “Please, Father, you know I can’t tell you.” 


Father Flanagan sighed in frustration. He said, “You are a very tight lipped lad, and I admire that. But you have sinned and now you have to atone. Starting today, you will be relieved of your altar boy duties for three months. Now go back to your pew and say ten Hail Mary’s and ten Our Fathers.” 


Sean slowly walks back to his pew and his friend Mike slides over and whispered, “What’d you get?” 


Sean whispered, “Three months vacation and four good leads.”


This is an example of third person humor, which is more complicated and requires the telling of a story. The “set up” is designed to commit us to a certain belief based on our collective experiences, then, the tables are turned. In a way, they are very like short snippets of the classic Paul Newman/Robert Redford movie The Sting. 





Here’s another example:


Bert and Ernie are two radio talk show hosts from Maine. One day Bert says, “Ernie, did you hear what happened at the saw mill today?” 


“No, Bert.” 


“Well, Old Tom Warner forgot to let go of the board and suddenly found his hand cut off by the blade.” 


“What did they do, Bert?” 


“Well, they put his hand in a bag of ice, took him to the hospital and the doctors sewed it right back on. And now he’s good as new.” 


A month later, Bert says, “Ernie, did you hear the news from the sawmill last week?” 


“No, Bert, what happened?” 


“Silas lost his balance, and before he could right himself, the blade cut off his right leg.” 


“What did they do, Bert?" 


“Well, they put his leg in a bag of ice, rushed him to the hospital, and the surgeons sewed it back on. And now he’s good as new.” 


A month goes by and Bert says, “Ernie, it was a terrible day down at the saw mill yesterday." 


“What happened?” 


“Mike was still a little tipsy from drinking at the bar the night before. He tripped and fell head first into the blade and got his head cut off.” 


“Don’t tell me, Bert. I know exactly what they did. The put his head in a bag of ice and rushed him to the hospital, where the surgeons sewed his head back on and now he’s good as new — right?” 


“No, Ernie. Mike died. He suffocated in the bag.” 


There is tremendous variability in who finds what funny. Humor is heavily dependent on shared backgrounds, moods, attitudes, and, yes, even prejudices. So, ethnic or racial jokes might be enjoyed by some espousing similar beliefs, but be considered anathema to others. 





Just think of the extreme reaction provoked in 2011 by the French controversial weekly magazine Charlie Hebdo after it published a cartoon ridiculing the prophet Mohammed. Its Paris offices were firebombed - clearly no laughing matter. 





Or this example, of a professional nature:


Q. What’s wrong with lawyer jokes?

A. Lawyers don’t think they’re funny and other people don’t think they’re jokes. 


Also, depending upon the intensity of your political persuasion, one may not appreciate his/her candidate being the target of American political satire.





After the political conventions this summer, the talk shows were rife with such humor. The night after the Republican convention, David Letterman said, “Before we get too riled up about Clint Eastwood’s encounter with the empty chair, you have to keep in mind that I’ve made a pretty good living talking to empty chairs over the years.”





And just before the Democratic convention, another late night host described a conversation between the Clintons. 


Hillary said, “Bill, I hear you’re going to Charlotte.” 


“What? Who told you that? I don’t even know Charlotte. If she told you she’s lying!”


Of course, my favorite exploiters of this genre are the Capitol Steps.





James Thurber has written, “Humor is emotional chaos remembered in tranquility.”





So it is that we can turn our own misfortunes or near-misses into the prize of humor. This may take the form of practical jokes. When we endure some “uncomical” mishap, the experience may inspire us to realize that a reprise of the incident, with someone else as the victim, might be amusing to watch! A prankster who discovers that there is wet paint on a handrail may not find his own painted hand humorous, but upon removing the wet-paint signs, he might happily anticipate his victims making the same mistake. 





Isn’t this, after all, what makes the slapstick antics of The Marx Brothers, Peter Sellers, Bill Murray, Chevy Chase, and countless other comedians so much fun to watch!





Can’t you just picture The Three Stooges:  We see Larry with a long ladder on his shoulder standing next to Moe and Curly. Larry turns to look at something behind him. As the ladder is rotating, Moe sees it coming but expects it will hit Curly first. At the last minute, Curly ducks, and Moe gets hit in the face.  


And how about the delight that people take in watching serious mishaps. Week after week the television program America’s Funniest Home Videos shows a parade of people getting hit in the crotch by errant baseballs, golf balls, kicking animals, and—most excruciating of all—by their own bicycle crossbars as they crash after attempting some lunatic stunt. Ouch! We wince, but we laugh at the same time.





Or we find amusement in the weekly predicaments in which unsuspecting victims find themselves on Candid Camera. In these cases, we have been let in on the prank ahead of time. In a way, we are the pranksters.





Generally jokes are not as funny the second time around. Yet, we can watch Monty Python and the Holy Grail again and again. We know what’s going to happen next. We actually laugh before the joke in anticipation of what amuses us. This may be similar to watching Peter Falk’s Columbo.  There is no mystery—we know the perpetrator within the first five minutes of the show. The entertainment comes from watching Columbo ensnare his target.  





Or, in the years when Charles Schultz was still alive, we could eagerly anticipate the annual fall rendition of Lucy pulling the football away from Charlie Brown at the last minute.





Of all the running jokes with which poor old Charlie Brown has been associated, none has a richer history – nor a longer one – than his attempts to kick the football. The fall of each year brought Lucy’s latest clever little ruse to persuade Charlie Brown to try one more time ... and her equally creative excuse for yet another failure.





With just a few exceptions, these Sunday strips appeared every September or October after the strip hit its stride in the late 1950s. That’s a lot of decades, and a lot of excuses. But how did it all begin? Believe it or not, with Violet, rather than Lucy.





Yes, Charlie Brown’s very first failed kick took place when Violet held the ball for him, in the November 14, 1951 daily strip. Clearly worried that he might accidentally kick her hand, she pulls away at the last second while saying, "I can’t go through with it!"





Lucy's involvement began with the November 16, 1952 Sunday strip. This was shortly after Lucy had been introduced, when she still looked (and was) several years younger than Charlie Brown. Aside from that, all the classic elements were in place ... and, as she pulled the football away at the last second, she explained, "I was afraid your shoes might be dirty."  [The Football Gags. Derrick Bang.]





There are perhaps tens of thousands of books about humor.  It is such a broad ranging topic, that it has been virtually impossible to claim an all-inclusive explanation. Most overviews condense to three theories—Superiority, Release, and Incongruity.





Superiority Theory posits that we recognize or sense that we feel some level of superiority over the target, such as the butt of the joke. We laugh at people or what they are doing. It isn’t so very long ago that travelling circus acts included the genetically or developmentally deformed. (If you saw The Elephant Man at the Williamstown Theatre Festival this summer you know what I mean). This theory goes as far back as Aristotle, who said that humor was the recognition of a failing resulting from an implied comparison between the noble state of a person or thing and an ignoble state.





So, for example, how about this familiar exchange:


A visiting Southerner is walking across Harvard Yard.  He runs into a senior student. “Where is the library at?” he asks. 


The Harvard student replies, “Around here we do not end our sentences with a preposition.” 


“Okay—where is the library at, you asshole?”


Or this example:


A Senior citizen is driving on the highway. His wife calls him on his cell phone and in a worried voice says, “Herman, be careful! I just heard on the radio that there was a madman driving the wrong way on Route 128. 


Herman says, “Not just one, there are hundreds!”


Alternatively, Release Theory holds that underlying tension, often sexual in nature, is relieved by laughing. Since expending the energy required to laugh must have some underlying purpose—we seek out humor to relieve anxiety. So, for example:





A man and a woman who have never met before find themselves in the same sleeping carriage of a train. After the initial embarrassment they both go to sleep, the woman on the top bunk, the man on the lower.



In the middle of the night the woman leans over, wakes the man and says, “I’m sorry to bother you, but I’m awfully cold and I was wondering if you could possibly get me another blanket.”



The man leans out and, with a glint in his eye, says, “I’ve got an better idea…just for tonight let’s pretend we’re married”



The woman thinks for a moment. “Why not,” she laughs. 


“Great,” he replies, “Get your own damn blanket.”


Or this Steve Martin quote: "You know 'that look' women get when they want sex? Me neither."





Or how about this classic:


The Teacher calls on Little Johnny. “Johnny—I have a math question for you.” 


Little Johnny says, “Okay, fire away!” 


The Teacher says, “There are three crows sitting on a fence. A hunter shoots one. How many are left?” 


Little Johnny quickly responds, “None!”



The Teacher repeats, “Listen carefully: Three crows are on the fence. The hunter shoots one. How many are left?”



Sure of himself, Johnny answers again, “None.”



The Teacher asks, “Could you explain your answer?”



Little Johnny responds, “Sure. The crow that gets shot falls off the fence dead. The other two fly away, afraid of the noise.”



“Actually”, the Teacher replies, “the answer is two, but I like the way you're thinking.”



Little Johnny says,  “Now I have a question for you.”



The Teacher says, “Go ahead.”



Little Johnny asks,  “There are three women walking down the street eating ice cream cones. One of them is licking it, one of them is biting it and one of them is sucking her ice cream cone. Which one is married?”



After thinking for a moment the Teacher responds,  “The one sucking the cone.”



Actually,” replies Johnny, “she’s the one wearing the wedding ring,  but I like the way you're thinking!"


Perhaps the theory most generally advocated for is Incongruity-Resolution Theory. This theory says that humor happens whenever a contradiction occurs that is subsequently resolved. Or when a belief that you, yourself, are committed to, usually without even realizing it, becomes invalidated.





So, for example:


A man named O’Riley was on trial for armed robbery. The jury came out and announced, “Not guilty.” 


“Wonderful,” said O’Riley to his lawyer, “does that mean I can keep the money?” 


Or:


Taking his seat in his chamber, the judge faced the opposing lawyers. 


“I have been given bribes by both of you,” the judge began. 


Both lawyers squirmed uncomfortably. 


“You, Attorney Leoni, gave me $15,000. And you, Attorney Campos, gave me $10,000.’’  


The judge reached in his pocket and pulled out a check, which he handed to Leoni. 


“Now, then, I’m returning $5,000 and we are going to decide this case solely on its merits!”





In this category of humor theory, listeners are lured into committing to a presumption that is later disclosed as mistaken. The humorous effect comes from the realization and acceptance that one has been led down the garden path.





Or as Mark Twain so aptly said: “What gets us into trouble is not what we know; it’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so.” 





Of course, there can also be a combination of theories at work as well.





So, for example, recall how you felt when you found the sunglasses that you were so frantically looking for on the top of your head.  Or suppose you get on an elevator, the door has closed, and you are distractedly texting on your phone. After a while, the door opens for a new passenger, and you suddenly realize you’ve forgotten to press the button for your floor and the elevator hasn’t moved at all. You ought to feel a sense of mirth for having assumed you were on your way—“silly me.” Or perhaps you discover that you’re waiting for the instant replay at a live game—and are ever so slightly embarrassed.





In these examples, it is a former/historical version of yourself to whom you now feel superior. Yet also there has been an “incongruity” or mistaken belief that has been discovered. Mirth can be defined as the pleasure of discovering a particular mistake—this is the response to humor.


Q.  How do you tell the sex of a chromosome?

A.  Pull down its genes.       


A new book by Mathew Hurley that arose from his 2006 dissertation at Tufts University — Inside Jokes —  posits a universal, “natural selection” derivation for humor. In other words it’s in the genes.  Much of the material for this paper comes from this analysis.





Biological theories observe that laughter occurs spontaneously in infancy and that the existence of humor is universal throughout human cultures. If evolution selected for the traits of laughter and humor, then those traits must be encoded in our genes.





It has been proposed that laughter evolved to promote group bonding, discharge nervous tension, or keep us healthy. The more laughter, the better. But, if true, we should laugh at any joke, however stupid, no matter how often we’ve heard it before--yet we do not. A good sense of humor implies a discriminating sense of humor, not a howling shriek at every turn. 





And so, Hurley argues, humor is intimately linked to thinking. There is the initial response—laughter and perhaps admiration for the cleverness of the joke—but then, also, the self-congratulation found in the satisfaction of “getting” the joke.





So the kind of joy that we feel when we complete a puzzle, master a new skill, discover a beautiful landscape, have a good day at work, or read a new author, may be the same basic pleasurable emotion that is triggered by getting a joke. 





All brains are anticipation generators. Their primary function is to extract information on the fly from the world around them and generate expectations that will serve the organism well in a potentially hostile environment. Yet this never ending series of assumptions is based on sparse, erratic, and incomplete information. The brain then derives predictions from experience. All these best guesses simplify our work and give us critical insights into the minds of others, streamlining our decisions. But mistakes are inevitable, and even a small faulty assumption can open the door to bigger and costlier mistakes. And yes, speed matters.  He who laughs last thinks slowest.  





A sense of humor is what keeps our brains alert for the gaps between our quick-fire assumptions and reality. This cognitive reflex is what Hurley calls the “the endogenous mind candy of mirth.”





On the other hand, when we are unable to solve a problem, there is a sense of bewilderment that is reminiscent of the feeling we have when we are unable to get a joke. 





Having to be told the inner workings of a joke is slightly embarrassing or demeaning. And, at the same time, often cheats the teller of the joke of his prize—your laughter.





In fact Max Eastman, in his 1936 book Enjoyment of Laughter, said, “The correct explanation of a joke not only doesn’t sound funny, but it does not sound like the correct explanation.” 





(As an aside, Eastman graduated from Williams College in 1905 where he was a roommate of Charles Whittlesey. You may recall prior Monday Evening Club papers by Tom Plunkett and Martin Langeveld on Whittlesey, who was known as the Lost Battalion commanding officer and a World War I hero.)





I think this is why I generally do not enjoy the cartoons of the New Yorker—I don’t “get” them. First, it takes me too long to figure them out—humor should be more spontaneous and quick. Then, even when I do come to understand them, I might be able to admire the “trick”; but they do not provoke a laugh. Worse yet, I have to cringe when my wife, Sue, explains them to me!





Then, there is also the matter of timing. For the audience to commit to the  set-up, there must be just enough time to make the necessary faulty inference but not enough time to double-check it. Wait too long and there is an increasing chance that a conflicting piece of information will bring the key belief into doubt—i.e. the audience won’t take the bait. If that occurs the chance for humor is doomed. Too little time and the improper commitment may never be made.





Of course humor doesn’t have to come from made up jokes. Often, it just appears in real life.





Some of you may have read in the paper several months ago the story of An Inept Bank Robber:


It seems a man, wanting to rob a downtown Bank of America, walked into the branch and wrote "This iz a stikkup. Put all your muny in this bag." 


While standing in line, waiting to give his note to the teller, he began to worry that someone had seen him write the note and might call the police before he reached the teller window. So he left the Bank of America and crossed the street to Wells Fargo. 


After waiting a few minutes in line, he handed his note to the Wells Fargo teller. She read it and, surmising from his spelling errors that he was not the brightest light in the harbor, told him that she could not accept his stick up note because it was written on a Bank of America deposit slip and that he would either have to fill out a Wells Fargo deposit slip or go back to Bank of America. 


Looking somewhat defeated, the man said "OK" and left the Wells Fargo. The Wells Fargo teller then called the police who arrested the man a few minutes later, as he was waiting in line back at the Bank of America.


Or let’s hear it for the robber from Wichita, Kansas. The security cameras filmed the exploding dye packs surrounding him in a fog of red haze as he hurried off to the get-a-way car. 





Any of you who have been hospitalized lately know that every, nurse, dietician, or physical therapist, who visits you asks you your name and birth date. This gets tiring after awhile. Recently I overheard my patient having this interaction with an OR nurse:


Nurse, “What’s your date of birth, Mr. Jones?

Mr. Jones, “April 20th.

Nurse, “What year?”

Mr. Jones, “Every year!”


So, why do we laugh? Laughing is involuntary—we generally can’t make ourselves laugh spontaneously without a stimulus. Current theory holds it is a form of communication. It is a signal of our cognitive prowess –and weakness, similar to the way smiling suggests to the outside world a sense of contentment or happiness. 





And what about the contagion of laughter? Isn’t this the hoped-for effect of the “canned” laughter in television situation comedies?  Have you ever been provoked into laughing in response to hearing others laugh without understanding the joke? Has anyone here seen the recent Volkswagen commercial, titled “It’s not the miles—it’s how you live them?” Is it even possible to watch this 30 second segment without breaking into smile, if not outright laughter? 











I prefer to think of the goal of humor; however it evolved, as a means of providing group enjoyment. We value friends with whom we can share not just casual conversation alone, but also entertain the possibility of a laugh. Our dear departed colleague, Bob Newman always used to say that the best thing about the Monday Evening Club was that it didn’t do any good. Maybe that’s true in the larger, worldly context. But in the microcosm of the people in this room, I think a lot of good happens.

Read More

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Under the green canopy: Hiking the Appalachian Trail the the Berkshires

Presented to the Club on Monday evening, March 12, 2012 by Richard L. Floyd


When I told Harold* my title for tonight’s paper he suggested it might be about a wedding! A great guess, but no, the paper is actually about my experiences of hiking on the Appalachian Trail in the Berkshires. “Under the Green Canopy” refers to the lush green foliage overhead when you are on the trail. The AT is also sometimes called the “Green Tunnel” by thru-hikers.


I first encountered the Appalachian Trail over fifty years ago in western New Jersey as a Boy Scout at camp No-Be-Bo-Sco. The camp, which is still going strong, sits alongside Kittatinny Ridge, near the Delaware Water Gap.


I went to camp there for several summers and we scouts hiked sections of the nearby AT. The trail skirts the opposite shore of Sand Pond. I have many memories of that lake; I came to camp as a beginner and learned to swim there, eventually earning my lifesaving merit badge, and when I was fourteen swam the Mile Swim there. I didn’t appreciate that the nearby trail was so special.


It was as a Boy Scout that I first learned to love hiking and camping. I know that when one thinks of New Jersey it does not conjure up pictures of beautiful forests and hills, but that is just what that part of northwestern New Jersey is like. If you don’t believe me you can visit. The camp is private, but years ago it ceded hundreds of acres to the Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Park and one can hike the trails there, including a portion of the AT.


Eventually one of the Scout leaders at camp must have told me that the trail went all the way from Georgia to Maine, and that some people hiked the whole thing in one season. From then on it was a dream of mine to thru-hike the trail, a dream I long deferred and have finally abandoned now that I’ve reached the age where one likes to sleep in one’s own bed.


Nonetheless, the AT has been a valued part of my life ever since those Boy Scout days. I met up with it again when I moved to New England to go to graduate school in 1971. I hiked portions of it with my future wife in the White Mountains in New Hampshire in the early 1970’s, and later with my brother in the 1980’s.


Then when I moved to Maine Martha and I took church youth groups hiking and camping on and near Mt. Katahdin, which is the northernmost terminus of the AT. I have run across the trail here and there through the years while hiking in Connecticut and Vermont.


But it has been during these last thirty years during which I have lived in Berkshire County that I have become most familiar with the trail, especially since 2000 when my hiking life took another turn.


It happened like this. In late September of 2000 I was a spectator for the Great Josh Billings Runaground, the Berkshires’ famous fun triathlon. I had been training all year to be a participant, but the month before I took a bad tumble on my bike and was on the disabled list.


As I was sulking on the sidelines with my arm in a sling, a good friend of mine approached me and asked me how I was doing. “Terrible,” I said, “I’m jumping out of my skin for lack of exercise because I can’t ride my bike.” He replied, “Well, I belong to a hiking group and you’re welcome to come along. It’s a bunch of old guys and won’t be very challenging for somebody in as good shape as you are, but, hey, if you want to come we’re hiking tomorrow and I’ll pick you up.”


So the next day I landed with my friend at the trailhead to the AT in Tyringham, not far from Tyringham Cobble. I saw some old friends, met some new ones, laced up my boots, and off the group went at such a fast pace that I was yo-yoing off the back for awhile.


And that was my introduction to the other men’s group I belong to which has Monday in its name, “The Monday Mountain Boys” (although to be strictly factual the name didn’t come about until a year later when the wives named us).


I liked the group so much that even after I rehabbed my body and fixed my bike the following year I kept hiking with them on Mondays, and I still often do. The hikes take us all over Berkshire County, but more than any other venue we hike the Berkshire section of the AT.


Those of us who live here tend to take for granted this iconic trail that wends it’s way through the length of our county. The entire AT in Massachusetts, some 90 miles of it, is here in Berkshire County.


Its official name is The Appalachian National Scenic Trail, but everybody calls it the AT. It is (more or less) 2,174 miles long and travels the spiny ridgeline of the Appalachian Mountains. It extends between Springer Mountain in Georgia and Mount Katahdin in Maine.
It winds its way through the states of North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire. And of the fifteen states it passes through only in Massachusetts is the entire trail in a single county.


The making of the Appalachian Trail was a vast undertaking. How did such a project come to be? To answer that question we need to back up and have a little history lesson about mountain hiking and trail-making.


Our story really only begins around 1830, since hiking for recreation and leisure is a fairly recent development in the history of humankind.


The earliest settlers to this part of the country brought with them the attitudes of Europe, where mountains were viewed chiefly as obstacles to travel. In a famous example, Martin Luther kept diaries of his trip from Germany to Rome in 1510 without mentioning a word about the scenery, which would have included a good portion of the Alps. And when the first English settlers reached the Berkshires they called them “the horrid hills.”


That view was widely shared. Mountains were dangerous places afflicted with unpredictable weather, wind and rain and snow and thunder and lightning. The paucity of Indian artifacts on mountains indicates that Native Americans avoided them as well, perceiving them as places where larger powers and forces best not tampered with dwelled. During Darby Field’s historic climb of Mt. Washington in 1642 he could convince only one of his Indian scouts to approach the summit with him.


But Field’s ascent of Mt. Washington back in the 17th century was very much an anomaly. Most of the Northeastern mountains didn’t have their first known ascent for more than a hundred years later. Mt. Mansfield in Vermont was first climbed in 1772 and Mt. Katahdin not until 1804 to give just a couple of examples.


It wasn’t until well after the Revolutionary War that men (and some women) took to the mountains in any numbers, and only during the 19th century that hiking became a leisure pastime, and mostly (as I mentioned) after 1830.


That may surprise us since for us the mountains are so firmly fixed as sublime objects of beauty. But the “purple mountain’s majesty” of Katherine Lee Bates’ song is a product of the 19th century imagination. Now that the land was tamed and settled, a movement arose that sought out the experience of wilderness as a retreat from urban life.


At the same time that Romanticism was taking hold in Europe, as a reaction to the harshness of the Industrial Revolution, there was in America a new aesthetic appreciation for the natural world. The mountains were no longer seen as dangerous, but as beautiful and soul refreshing. We can see this change in the writings of the time, in the essays of Emerson, the poetry of Whittier, the travel journals of Thoreau, and the idealized backwoods novels of Cooper.


These changing attitudes were soon followed by changes in transportation that made the mountains easier to reach. Where once a mountain climb was the pastime of the well to do and their paid guides, with the coming of the railroads the urban masses could now get to the country and did. Mountain tourism had begun.


By the end of the 1840’s Berkshire County had better rail service than we have today. Pittsfield was connected to the Hudson River in the west and to Springfield in the east, and in 1842 the Housatonic Railroad connected Bridgeport, Connecticut with W. Stockbridge.


The mountains became popular places to visit for leisure and recreation, and this new rail access created the fad of going to mountaintops. In the decades before the Civil War mountain vacation centers and summit houses sprang up throughout New England.


The Berkshires were something of an exception, as no major resorts were built here and there were few public accommodations. This was because it was the time when the great stately homes (called “cottages”) were being built as the wealthy came to enjoy the natural world in their own way (and with their own kind).


In many places in New England bridle paths were cut to reach the summits of mountains, and urbanites would travel by horse or carriage to see the vistas. But the summit house trend in New England ended as quickly as it began, and by the mid 1870’s many of the properties were abandoned or poorly maintained.


But hiking prevailed and more and more trails were cut throughout the region. One of the very earliest was the Hopper Trail, still in use today, which was cut to the summit of Mt. Greylock in a single day by an energetic (and obviously large) group of Williams College students in 1830.


After the Civil War hiking clubs sprang up throughout New England. An early club here in Berkshire County was the Alpine Club of Williamstown founded in1863 by Professor Mark Hopkins of Williams College. This club was coeducational from the beginning. One young member was Samuel Hubbard Scudder would later play a role in establishing the Appalachian Mountain Club in the 1870’s.


A later Berkshire hiking club was the Pathfinders or the “Leg-It” Club, based in Stockbridge and full of worthies like sculptor Daniel Chester French.


By the turn of the 20th century a new big change was just around the corner. Just as the railroads had fueled the 19th century hiking boom it was the coming of the automobile in the new century that finally set the stage for the building of the AT. One of the great ironies of this whole story is how decisive new transportation technologies were for changes in foot travel.


The automobile made remote trailheads easier to reach, and sadly true wilderness harder to find. The future environmental impact of greater numbers of trail users was yet unperceived, and the hiking boom continued unabated.


The auto was also instrumental in a new focus on long distance trails, and talk of connecting existing trails to make a long-distance trail began.


Many New England trails were being connected to one another to allow longer trekking, and various dreamers and big thinkers envisioned a great long trail following the spine of the Eastern mountains.


It is hard to say exactly when the AT was born, but the October 1921 publication of “An Appalachian Trail: A Project in Regional Planning” by Benton MacKaye in the Journal of the American Institute of Architects is often recognized as the birth for the Appalachian Trail.


And if anyone deserves the title of “the father of the AT” it is MacKaye. He had a somewhat utopian vision for a series of work and farming camps along the ridges of the Appalachian Mountains, with a great trail connecting them, from the highest point in the North (Mt. Washington in New Hampshire) to the highest in the South (Mt. Mitchell in North Carolina). But MacKaye’s focus was not on hiking or the trail itself, but on a communitarian retreat from the city life and work.


MacKaye, a regional planner, promoted his idea within his large network of friends and colleagues in Washington, New York, and Boston.


Although MacKaye had the vision it was others who did the actual work to make the trail a reality. New York newspaper columnist Raymond Torrey organized a work crew to cut the first AT-specific miles in Harriman–Bear Mountain State Park under the leadership of Maj. William A. Welch. It was Welch who expanded the goal to “Maine to Georgia,” and designed the diamond shaped marker still in use on the trail today.


More organization was need so the first Appalachian Trail conference was convened in 1925. Their stated purpose was to organize “a body of workers (representative of outdoor living and of the regions adjacent to the Appalachian range) to complete the building of the Appalachian Trail.” An organization of that name was formed, and Maj. Welch was named its first chair.


Real headway began when a retired Connecticut judge, Arthur Perkins, and a young federal lawyer in Washington, Myron H. Avery, took charge of the efforts as a hiking-focused cause.


Perkins died in 1932, and Avery carried on the work. Avery is an important figure in this story. He led a small corps of activists, numbering perhaps 200, in identifying and blazing routes.


They established local clubs from Pennsylvania to Georgia, set standards for the trail, and published guidebooks and maps.


They also negotiated with national parks and other federal agencies for land use and rights of way. It is extraordinary that a totally volunteer effort could accomplish such an undertaking.


But it wasn’t always pretty, and Berkshire County is a good example of how difficult it was to put all the pieces together and get everybody to work together.


Massachusetts got an early start, but was one of the last states to finally complete the trail.


Benton MacKaye was from Massachusetts and his article about an Appalachian Trail in 1922 immediately inspired nature writer Walter Pritchard Eaton to outline a route through the Berkshires.


Eaton’s route was not the one we have today. It started by using existing trails on Mt. Everett and going in a northeasterly direction until October Mountain Forest, much as the trail does today. North of that, however, his trail went west, south of Pittsfield, and then went along the ridge of the Taconics all the way to Mt. Greylock. From there he proposed following the Bellows Pipe Trail rather than the ridge to its west that the trail follows today.


Eaton organized some Berkshire schoolboys to work on the trail, but the effort sputtered and didn’t get much traction until 1928 when the Berkshire Hills Conference, a tourism organization, created a three-man Trails Committee. Eaton represented the south end, Archie Sloper represented the north and Mt. Greylock, and Franklin Couch of Dalton represented the middle.


Couch was a popular civic leader who was a scout leader of a large Boy Scout troop in Dalton and the hill-towns. He was our member Charles Sawyer’s fathers scout leader. Under Couch’s leadership, from 1928 to 1931 the Berkshire Hills Conference group cut a nearly complete trail from Connecticut to Vermont.


The Williams Outing Club and a Williamstown school principal named John B. Clarke cut trails in the north. Sloper and some local Boy Scouts cut the southern flank of Greylock. Couch and his Boy Scouts cut trails around Dalton. A Pittsfield man, S. Waldo Bailey cut much of rest. But they never quite finished it.


So far this was a purely local effort, but in 1931 the Berkshire Chapter of the AMC, which despite its name was dominated by leaders from Springfield and the Pioneer Valley, started sending work crews to the AT independently from the locals. Without communication between the two groups they worked at cross-purposes, cutting different routes and even taking down markers from the other group.


As you can imagine the involvement of “outsiders” didn’t go down well and a schism ensued between the groups. Eventually, in 1931, Myron Avery from the Appalachian Trail Conference (ATC) made two trips to the Berkshires to see if he could resolve the problem.


He didn’t. He may well have made it worse. Avery may have misread the situation, but in any case he ended up siding with the Berkshire Chapter of the AMC, who were then given authority for the trail.


Spurned by the ATC, Couch and the other actual builders of much of the trail withdrew.


The Berkshire Chapter of the AMC finally completed the Trail during the years 1932 to 1935. But the alienation of the locals made it hard to get workers for trail maintenance and the Berkshire portion of trail fell into disarray.


Between 1937 and 1940 two groups stepped up to rescue the trail, the Mount Greylock Ski Club, and Metawampe, the faculty outing club of U. Mass in Amherst. (The story of this schism is told in detail in Waterman’s Forest and Crag, p. 498-503)


The story of the problems in the Berkshires hints at what it took to get the whole trail completed with volunteers. After all, the Berkshire section in only 90 miles out of more than 2000. Any of you who have served as selectman of a small town or on a church board knows what it is like to get things accomplished with volunteers. The Berkshire story is just one of many in how this monumental trail got built.


But finally the entire AT officially opened on August 14, 1937. It faced challenges from the beginning. Born during the Great Depression and in a few years came the start of World War II, when gas rationing limited travel.


The end of World War II brought opportunities to fix the trail, but also brought new challenges in the form of rapidly expanding residential and highway development.


At this time nearly half the AT was still either on roads or used rights of way on private property that newly affluent people wanted for vacation homes. The battle between public use and private property has continued throughout the life of the trail.


In 1948 Earl V. Shaffer, a Pennsylvania veteran who said he was “walking off the war,” reported to a disbelieving Avery at the ATC that he had just walked the entire length of the trail in a single journey of less than five months. Shaffer had become the first successful thru-hiker of the AT. He would do it twice more, in 1965 and in 1998, 50 years after his first time. He was 79, the oldest person to accomplish it, a record he held until 2004.


Ironically, the founders of the AT had never envisioned an individual hiking the entire trail in a single season, and had dismissed the idea as a stunt. A popular one it turns out. Now every year thousands attempt a thru hike. Only about 1 in 4 finish it, about 600 a year in the past several years.


By the early 1960’s the popularity of the trail had outrun the capacity of its volunteers to run and maintain it. Long established rights of way were being lost to development and a crisis was looming.


Another important figure in this story is Stanley A. Murray, who would become the ATC’s second-longest-serving chair. Murray worked to both reenergize the ATC (by building up its base of individual members), and also to revive the idea of the federal government’s protecting of the AT and its surrounding lands from adverse development. This was something that both MacKaye and Avery had advocated.


On October 2, 1968, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the National Trails System Act (NTSA), creating within the national park and forest systems a new class of public lands, national scenic trails, with the AT and the unfinished Pacific Crest Trail the first to be so designated.


States were encouraged to acquire lands for the AT, and the National Park Service (NPS), with administrative responsibility for it all, and USDA Forest Service authorized to do so. The ATC soon hired its first two employees.


In March 1978, President Jimmy Carter signed into law amendments to the NTSA directing federal agencies to move forward and authorizing almost $100 million from the Land and Water Conservation Fund for that purpose.


The most complicated public-land acquisition program in history was begun; NPS formed an AT Project Office and special AT Land Acquisition Office.


The ATC had to manage what would become more than 250,000 acres of public land, an estate with one of the greatest troves of natural and cultural resources in the entire national park system


In July 2005 the Appalachian Trail Conference changed of its name to Appalachian Trail Conservancy, still volunteer-based. The cooperation of volunteers with state and federal agencies has allowed the trail to flourish despite unprecedented use never foreseen by its early founders.


What began as an ad hoc enterprise by a loose collection of regional and local volunteers is today a large and efficient organization of cooperation between volunteers and agencies.


The result of which is that the AT is currently protected along more than 99 percent of its course by federal or state ownership of the land or by right-of-way. Each year an estimate of more than 4,000 volunteers contribute over 175,000 hours of effort to maintain it.


I’ve said a lot about the history and organization of the AT, but not much about the trail itself. So let me offer a highly selective and impressionistic picture of the trail as I have experienced it.


Here in Massachusetts the AT enters our southern border from Connecticut at Sages Ravine. Sages Ravine has a series of falls and cascades that are beautiful in any season, but spectacular when there has been a lot of rain or snow melt. Since most of the AT has been logged at one time or another it is rare to see old growth forest, but there is some at Sages Ravine.


This southerly most section of the trail is also one of the most challenging for the hiker, as the trail takes one over numerous rock faces, many of them during climbs. It was near here the very first day I hiked with poles that I lost my footing on a rock face and broke one of my new poles.


The trail goes through the beautiful Race Brook Falls before it climbs to Mount Race, which has lovely open views of the southern Berkshires and Connecticut. The trail then climbs to the highest peak in the southern Taconic Range, Mount Everett (2,602 ft.).


Descending from the summit the trail skirts the edge of Guilder Pond (where I usually have a swim in the hot weather) and then climbs along a rocky ridge before descending steeply to Jug End Road and down to the Housatonic River Valley. If you make this descant in the fall after a rain you are likely to slip and slide all the way down on the wet leaves.


The trail crosses Rt 7 south of Great Barrington and meanders in a general northeasterly direction through East Mountain, Beartown, and October Mountain State Forests.


There is a Shelter at Upper Goose Pond that has a caretaker during the hiking season. It was here I met a German engineer who had quit his job and come over to thru-hike the AT. North of here the trail goes over the Massachusetts Turnpike on a footbridge


The Trail goes by Finnerty Pond, where one of the weirdest of my AT experiences took place. Several of us Monday Mountain Boys were sitting on logs having our lunch when we heard someone coming towards us on the AT from the North loudly reciting what I thought was Shakespeare. The sound got louder and louder as the hiker approached until a young man finally emerged and greeted us. It wasn’t Shakespeare but “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. It turns out this solo thru hiker was doing the International AT, with extensions north into Canada and South of Georgia. He carried a poetry anthology with him, and at night he would memorize poems and recite them aloud on the trail. He said, “It also alerted any black bears to his coming.”


Before the trail passes through the town of Dalton there is one of my favorite parts, from Kirchner Rd. to Grange Hall Rd. which takes you over Warner Hill, a small outcropping with beautiful views to the North and Mt. Greylock. At this point you are just East of the City of Pittsfield. I once met a couple of thru-hikers at Warner Hill who were waiting to get picked up by the sales staff at Eastern Mountain Sports at the Berkshire Mall in Lanesboro so they could buy new boots.


Another curious thing I have noticed at Warner Hill. You have to step off the AT and walk a few feet to see the nice view. Sometimes you will see thru-hikers make the turn and never look up. In fairness they are fighting time and the weather, but sometimes miss the sights.


North of Warner Hill is Kay Wood Shelter, one of the 15 huts and shelters in the Berkshire part of the AT, and named after an active AMC volunteer from Dalton who was once in a Bible study with me.


The trail goes through Dalton towards Cheshire to another of my favorites, Cheshire Cobble, a large outcropping with good views of Mt. Greylock and the Hoosic River Valley.


In the town of Cheshire the AT crosses the Ashuwilticook Rail Trail, crosses Rt 8 and climbs along the ridge of the Greylock massif before reaching the summit of My Greylock, the highest point in the state at 3,491 feet. As at Sages Ravine another rare old growth forest may be seen on parts of the Hopper nearby.


Another interesting fact about Mt. Greylock is that for thru-hikers coming from the south it is the first sub-alpine region they will have seen since  Mt. Rogers in Virginia. Mt. Greylock has a large sub alpine region, the only such forest in Massachusetts, extending down to 3,000 feet, which in the south would be far from the sub-alpine cutoff. This is a result of Mt. Greylock’s powerful prevailing westerly winds, as the summits along its ridgeline rise approximately 200 feet to 650 feet higher than any other peak in Massachusetts.


From the top of Mt. Greylock you get clear views in all directions. To the South you can see Pittsfield’s two lakes, Pontoosuc and Onota (less than a mile from my house) and Bousquet Ski Area and South Mt. To the East you can see the town of Adams and the Hoosic Range and all the way to Mt. Wachusett on a clear day. To the North you can see Williamstown and the Green Mountains of Vermont (and Mt. Monadnock in NH to the NE). To the West you can see the Taconic Range and New York State.


From the summit of Greylock the trail quickly descends to the valley within 2 miles of North Adams and Williamstown, before ascending again through the Clarksburg State Forest to the Vermont state line where it connects with the Long Trail.


The Berkshire Chapter of the Appalachian Mountain Club still maintains the trail throughout Massachusetts. Volunteer trail-masters are each assigned a portion of the trail that they are responsible for looking after. They walk the trail, noticing fallen trees, water problems, and erosion. The pick up litter and organize work groups.


Another group that looks after the trail are the AMC Ridgerunners, a group of about thirty young adults who travel the length of the AT and serve as ambassadors and educators, as well as unofficial cops with no legal authority. They use instead the “authority of the resource” to educate rather than scold the errant hiker walking off trail or washing dishes in a stream. They also carry some first aid supplies, which I have availed myself of after skinning a knee near  Mt. Everett.


What else needs to be said about the AT? Well, for one thing the trail is more frequently hiked from South to North. These northbound hikers typically begin in early April and finish in late summer or early fall. Southbound hikers typically begin in June. Northbound hikers are called NOBO (Northbound) or GAME (Georgia to Maine) and southbound hikers are called SOBO or MEGA. The entire trail is blazed with 2 by 6 inch white paint blazes. In my Boy Scout days there were metal markers, but they are rare today.


As mentioned hikers who attempt to complete the trail from end to end in one season are called “thru-hikers,” while those who complete it in separate trips are called “section hikers.” “Flipfloppers” complete the trail within 12 months using an alternate itinerary.


Thru-hikers are often given trail nicknames called trail names. These are often whimsical. A friend of mine from the Monday Mountain Boys who is wiry and a fast hiker was known as “Slimfast.”


Some people bring their dogs on the trail, but dogs are not allowed in the Smokies or in Baxter Park in Maine and must be kenneled during those portions of the trail. Guide dogs, however, are permitted and in 1990 a hiker named Bill Irwin, who is blind, hiked the trail with his dog Orient.


What is the future of the AT? To a great extent it has been a victim of its own success. The backpacking boon of the last quarter of the 20th century to our time has put more people on the trail than were ever imagined. In heavily traveled areas such as the White Mountains erosion from overuse can easily be seen. The advent of hiking poles has added new holes along the trail. Volunteers work tirelessly to maintain the trail, rerouting worn areas, limiting access to endangered portions. The tension between access to the trail and its conservation is a constant struggle.


As my story comes to an end let me put in a word that hiking on the trail is far superior to hearing a paper about it. From the hardiest thru-hiker to the most leisurely dog walker the AT offers great opportunities to get outdoors and enjoy all its benefits.


The section from Kirchner Rd. to Warner Hill can be walked in less than half an hour with one of the best views in the county. As we have seen, it took many people to put this great trail together, and it still takes many volunteers to keep it maintained. We are in their debt.


*Harold Salzmann, Club secretary
Read More

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Red and Blue Divided by 11 = Purple: The rival regional cultures of America

Presented to the Club by Jack Spencer on Monday evening, Feb. 27, 2012


This paper is dedicated to Martin [Langeveld], in appreciation for all that he does by making us part of the cyber world by posting our essays online.  But even more than the dedication is that, against all my instinctual inclinations, I have written this paper out so it can join the ranks of all the illustrative essays that are already there.  It will also mean that the club will have a reasonable dismissal time as an organized, written paper will mean that I ad lib less.


Before I partially explain my title, “Red and Blue Divided by 11 = Purple,” let me first express my regret that a title was not created which would get more hits, so that it would, at least, be in the top four.  An alternative title was thought up, “Sex & More Sex Divided by Catholic Bishops’ View of Birth Control = Rick Santorum on Steroids.”  This title would do quite well and might start a trend in the club that, rather than obscure titles, there will be titles that have even less to do with the paper being presented but will contain key words which will get hits, i.e. Lindsay Lohan, Lady Gaga, Giants and Super Bowl.


But back to my original topic and where it came from.  For many years, especially since the way the 2000 Presidential election was decided (and despite a period of hope with Obama’s election in 2008), I have been quite concerned about the divisions in our society and the inability to reach pragmatic and reasonable solutions to issues such as an understandable and fair tax code, modifications to social security so it is safe for the next 30-40 years, environmental trade-offs so real changes take place, transportations bill, etc., etc.  Some issues such as Medicare and the health system are more complex.  We appear to be unable, in many areas, to function in the 21st century.


The reasons are many and this essay just means to touch on (1) defining some of the issues (2) presenting some theories on the complexity we have become.


In Colin Woodard’s book, On American Nations, he argues that it is too simplistic to describe us as red and blue states, with a few that are purple that can shift either way, such as Colorado.  We are eleven rival regional cultures.  This map I am handing out (it is the teacher in me) shows where the eleven are and what Woodard has labeled them.  Since we in the Monday Evening Club have people born outside of Yankeedom and many who have lived a variety of places in the United States, your vies in the discussion could be interesting.  For the sake of full disclosure, I am Yankeedom every which way, from ancestors to where I have lived.  Instead of the slogan, “Don’t blame me, I’m from Massachusetts,” it should have been, “Don’t blame me, I’m from the steadfast Yankeedom.”


Here is a summary of Woodard’s thesis and clarification of his 11 nations.


But first, it is important to define what he means by the word “nation.”  It is not a state, a sovereign political entity, such as New Zealand or China.  “A nation is a group of people who share – or believe they share – a common culture, ethnic origin, historical experience, artifacts and symbols.  North America’s eleven nations are all stateless.”


Because of this, Americans have been deeply divided since the days of Jamestown and Plymouth.  There has never been one America.  He states, “America’s most essential and abiding divisions are not between red and blue states, capital and labor, blacks and whites, the faithful and the secular.  Rather…that the United States is a federation comprised of the whole or part of eleven regional nations.


Rather than decreasing in the 21st century, the “fault lines between North America’s regional interests have been growing even wider, fueling cultural wars, Constitutional struggles, and alarmingly frequent lease for unit.  Fox example – why are people still divided over such fundamental issues as whether the United States is a Christian nation or a secular one?”


These regional nations have regarded each other as competitors for political power and even as enemies, i.e. Civil War, cultural upheavals of the 1960s, and the upcoming Federal election for President and Congress.  They all continue to uphold their distinguishing ideals today with results that can be seen in the composition of the US Congress today or a county by county election may of almost every competitive presidential election.  As Tip O’Neil said, “All politics are local.”
  1. Yankeedom – Founded by radical Calvinists…a cultures that put great emphasis on education, local political control and the pursuit of the great good, faith in the potential of government to improve people’s lives, believe in social engineering, has a middle class ethos and considerable respect for intellectual achievement.  It has been locked in nearly perpetual combat with the deep South for control of the federal government.

  2. New Netherland – Short-lived but has had a lasting impact by laying down the cultural DNA for what is now greater New York City – profound tolerance for diversity and a commitment to freedom of inquiry.  Today its influence over media, publishing, fashion and intellectual and economic life is hard to overstate.

  3. Midlands – Most “American” of the nations.  Founded by English Quakers – spawned the culture of Middle American and the Heartland.  Skeptical of top-down governmental intervention.  Key swing vote in every national debate.  Moderating force.

  4. Tidewater – Fundamentally conservative region – high value placed on respect for authority and tradition.  Played a central role in the writing of the Constitution.  Nation in decline – losing out to the spread of the Midlands.

  5. Greater Appalachia – Scots-Irish, Scots and north England frontiersmen.  Suspicious of aristocrats and social references.  Warrior ethic.  Provided many of the nation’s military, rednecks, white trash, NASCAR.

  6. Deep South – Bastion of white supremacy, aristocrats, privilege.  It remains the least democratic of the nations.  Center of state’s rights movement, racial segregation, and labor and environmental deregulation.  Locked in an epic battle with Yankeedom and left coast for the future of the nation.

  7. New France – Near Canada, with New Orleans here.  Not important for this paper.

  8. El Norte – Long has been a hybrid between Anglo & Spanish America.  Far our prediction is that by the end of the 21st century, El Norte in the US and northern Mexico become a new sovereign state.  But today the Hispanic population is becoming more important.  This past week’s cover of Time magazine is Yo Decido – Why Latinos will pick the next President.

  9. Left Coast – Has a strong strain of New England intellectualism and idealism even as it embrace a culture of individual fulfillment.  Been the birthplace of modern environmental movement and the global information revolution, gay rights movement.  Closest ally of Yankeedom, it battles constantly against the libertarian-corporate agenda for the far West.

  10. Far West – With a few exceptions, this area could not be effectively developed without the deployment of vast individual resources – so much of it was done by large corporations (railroads) or by the Federal government (Hoover Dam).  Created a paradox of reviling the Federal government for interfering, while demanding it continue to receive federal money.

  11. First Nation – Mainly Canada, except for Alaska and casinos in the US Vast region.  Starting to emerge as a force.

But are not we a melting pot?  Have not public education, popular culture, intermarriage, moving from one nation to another, sports, etc. etc.?  No, replies Woodard – they have altered but mainly assimilated into the culture around them – not replaced it.  “Doctrine of First Effective Settlement.”


And also since 1976, Americans have been relocating to communities where people share these values and world view.  The proportion of voters living in landslide counties for one party (a victory margin of 20%) increased from 26.8 per cent in 1976 to 4 per cent in 2004.


Of course, these boundaries are not set in stone, they’ve shifted before and they will undoubtedly shift again.  Culture is always on the move.


It is also very complex.  In any particular locality you will find minority enclaves, i.e. Mormons Far West, Republican towns in Berkshire County.


He argues that in the 20th century, the alliance of Yankeedom, Left Coast and New Netherland have been the main influence on the federal government, that even Republican Presidents, such as Nixon and Eisenhower, “saw the quest for betterment of the ‘common good’ as best achieved through the creation of a frugal, competent, and effective government supported by a strong tax base and able to ensure the availability and prudent management of shares assets.”  But in the past 20 years, the Republican party has become the vehicle of less government, less taxes, less intrusion as noted by the very few Republicans who voted for health care overhaul, financial reform and for Clinton’s impeachment.  The block created by bringing together Deep South, Greater Appalachia and Tidewater accounts for the difficulty of Mitt Romney to be embraced.


This makes the swing areas (purples) Midlands, El Norte and the Far West.  Midlands so truly middle of the road and never sides unambiguously with one coalition, candidate or movement.  It also straddles but does not control many of the key battleground states such as Ohio and Missouri.  Far West as described before is a bit contradictory – less government regulations but wants federal money.  Also has a strong libertarian streak – balks at restriction on dissent and civil liberties.


But the future Woodard claims and the balance of power will “be shaped by the rapidly growing, increasingly assertive Hispanics of El Norte – inroad in New Mexico, south Texas, southern Arizona, southern California, Nevada and Colorado.  He argues that with Dixie ad Far West railing against the dangers of Mexican immigrants, El Norte can be expected to back the Northern bloc for some time to come.


Does this spell doom for the Republican Party?  Not necessarily, but it means that they need to nominate a Hispanic from California or Texas that has Yankeedom ideas.  Right now it does not appear to be likely this year, unless Rick Santorum goes to the mountain and receives a new ten commandments.
Woodard even speculates that it might have been good for the Deep South to have left the union.  But that is another paper.  He also states, “One thing is certain:  if Americans seriously want the United States to exist in something like its current form, they had best respect the fundamental tenets of our unlikely union.  The United States needs its central government to function cleanly, openly, and efficiently because it’s one of the few things binding us together.”


Before I end, a digression will take place and a quiz will be given to you.  Here is a sample of four questions of the 25:
  1. Have you ever lived in a neighborhood for at least a year in an American neighborhood in which a majority of your 50 nearest neighbors probably did not have a college education?

  2. During the last month have you voluntarily hung out with people who were smoking a cigarette?

  3. During the past five years, have you or your spouse gone fishing?

  4. Have you ever watched an Oprah, Dr. Phil or Judge Judy show all the way through?

The scoring is not simple, so I have provided you with all 25 questions and how to score your answers.  Not now, but at your leisure.  Highest score wins a six pack of Budweiser to bring with him and his significant other to Lebanon Valley Speedway.


All this is from a book – Coming Aport: The State of White America 1960-2010 – by Charles Murray, in which he argues our nation is coming apart at the seams (recent statistics on children born to single mothers).  He argues white upper class still practice the “virtues” of family, marriage, work hard, importance of education, but that the upper class has become isolated from the middle and lower classes – i.e. disparity in income, zip code addresses, etc.


But thanks to Martin, I must not elaborate on this or Part 3 that I had as writing my paper out has made me realize that enough is enough.


So what is the predication for the future?  It is fun to speculate and will be even more interesting to see.  What I do know is that in 2028 (a Presidential election year), on a Monday evening in the Berkshires, there will be a group hosted by someone as gracious and warm as Bob Anderson and a paper listened to by a caring and thoughtful group which may or may not include women.
Read More